. .

 

Performance Indicator Reference Sheet - 11

Goal : Increased competitiveness of agricultural value chains in Ghana

SO: Inclusive agricultural sector growth

Intermediate Result - IR 1.2: Increased Market Access and Trade

Sub- Result- IR.1:

Name of Indicator: EG.3.2-22 Value of new private sector capital investment in the agriculture sector or food chain leveraged by Feed the Future implementation

Is this a Performance Plan and Report indicator?  No ___    Yes __x__, for Reporting Year(s), FY 2014, FY 2015, FY2016 and FY2017 and   FY2018                            If yes link to foreign assistance frame work:                                                                                 

DESCRIPTION

Precise Definition(s): Investment is defined as any use of private sector resources intended to increase future production output or income, to improve the sustainable use of agriculture-related natural resources (soil, water, etc.), to improve water or land management, etc. The “food chain” includes both upstream and downstream investments. The indicator only includes capital investments. It does not include operating capital, for example, for inputs or inventory. Upstream investments include any type of agricultural capital used in the agricultural production process such as animals for traction, storage bins, and machinery. Downstream investments could include capital investments in equipment, etc. to do post-harvest transformation/processing of agricultural products as well as the transport of agricultural products to markets. “Private sector” includes any privately-led agricultural activity managed by a for-profit formal company.

A CBO or NGO resources may be included if they engage in for-profit agricultural activity. “Leveraged by Feed the Future implementation” indicates that the new investment was directly encouraged or facilitated by activities funded by ADVANCE 2. Investments reported should not include funds received by the investor from USG as part of any grant or other award. New investment means investment made during the reporting year.

Unit of Measure: US Dollars

Disaggregated by:  None

Rational or justification for indicator (optional):
Increased investment is the predominate source of economic growth in the agricultural and other economic sectors. Private sector investment is critical because it indicates that the investment is perceived by private agents to provide a positive financial return and therefore is likely to lead to sustainable increases in agricultural production. Agricultural growth is critical to achieving the Feed the Future goal to “Sustainably Reduce Global Poverty and Hunger.”

Type: Output

Direction of change:  Higher is better

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION

Data Source(s): Secondary sources (from the financial records of private sector engaged with ADVANCE II)

Method of data collection and construction:  Examination and organization of financial service data

Frequency/Timing of Data Collection: Annually

Reporting Frequency: Annually

Estimated cost of data collection:

Individual(s) responsible at USAID:  AOTR and USAID/Ghana M&E Specialist

Individual responsible for providing data to USAID: ACDI/VOCA Chief of Party

Location of Data Storage:  ACDI/VOCA ADVANCE MIS

DATA QUALITY ISSUES

Date of Initial Data Quality Assessments and name of reviewer:

Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): TBD

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: TBD

Date of Future Data Quality Assessments (optional): annually

CHANGES TO INDICATOR

Changes to Indicator: Indicator title change from  “4.5.2-38 Value of new private sector investment in the agriculture sector or food value chain leveraged by FTF implementation” to “EG.3.2-22 Value of new private sector capital investment in the agriculture sector or food chain leveraged by Feed the Future implementation”

Procedures for Future Data Quality Assessments:  To verify the quality and consistency of the data collected and disseminated, the ADVANCE M&E team will conduct annual data quality reviews. Through this review, we will assess the validity, reliability and timeliness of data. Based on the review, we will modify data collection methodology as needed and update the M&E Plan accordingly. The M&E Coordinator will develop a Data Quality Strategy specific to the ADVANCE project and the data collection methods, sources and timelines that will be established.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: ACDI/VOCA M&E Coordinator

Presentation of data:  Table  and annual report narrative

Review of Data:   ADVANCE M&E Coordinator and ACDI/VOCA headquarters M&E

Reporting of Data:  Quarterly/Semi-annual/Annual Performance Monitoring Report (PMR)

Notes on Baselines/Targets:

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR VALUES

 

 

 

Baseline Values FY14

 

 0

 Notes

 

Year

Targets

Actuals

 

FY14

$800,000

$210,216

 

FY15

$800,000

$1,033,466

 

FY16

$800,000

$1,703,475

 

FY17

$800,000

$537,012

 

FY18

$800,000

   

LOP

$4,000,000

$3,427,471

 

THIS SHEET LAST UPDATED ON: April , 2018

 

 

Performance Indicator Reference Sheet - 12

Goal : Increased competitiveness of agricultural value chains

SO: Inclusive agricultural sector growth

Intermediate Result IR-1.2: Increased Market Access and Trade

Sub- Result- IR.1:

Name of Indicator:  0.00 Number of value chain actors accessing finance (CI)

Is this a Performance Plan and Report indicator?  No ___    Yes __x__, for Reporting Year(s), FY 2014, FY 2015, FY2016 and FY2017 and   FY2018                           

DESCRIPTION

Precise Definition(s): Loan or credits provided by financial institution for start-up business and/or business expansion.  Examples of financial services for value chains actors include, but are not limited to, loans, savings schemes, and insurance plans obtained from: Private banks, Microfinance institutions

Unit of Measure: Number

Disaggregated by:  1. Gender-Male and Female, 2. Value Chain  Actor Type

Rational or justification for indicator (optional):

Type: Output

Direction of change:  Higher is better

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION

Data Source(s): Records from Microfinance partners and microenterprises

Method of data collection and construction:   Examination and organization of Microfinance service data

Frequency/Timing of Data Collection: Quarterly

Reporting Frequency: Quarterly

Estimated cost of data collection:

Individual(s) responsible at USAID:  AOTR and USAID/Ghana M&E Specialist

Individual responsible for providing data to USAID: ACDI/VOCA Chief of Party

Location of Data Storage:  ACDI/VOCA ADVANCE MIS

DATA QUALITY ISSUES

Date of Initial Data Quality Assessments and name of reviewer:

Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): TBD

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: TBD

Date of Future Data Quality Assessments (optional): annually

CHANGES TO INDICATOR

Changes to Indicator

Procedures for Future Data Quality Assessments:  To verify the quality and consistency of the data collected and disseminated, the ADVANCE M&E team will conduct annual data quality reviews. Through this review, we will assess the validity, reliability and timeliness of data. Based on the review, we will modify data collection methodology as needed and update the M&E Plan accordingly. The M&E Coordinator will develop a Data Quality Strategy specific to the ADVANCE project and the data collection methods, sources and timelines that will be established.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: ADVANCE M&E Coordinator

Presentation of data:  Table  and annual report narrative

Review of Data:  ACDI/VOCA M&E Coordinators1and ACDI/VOCA headquarters M&E

Reporting of Data:  Quarterly/Semi-annual/Annual Performance Monitoring Report (PMR)

Notes on Baselines/Targets:

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR VALUES

Year

Targets

Actuals

Notes

Baseline Year FY14

 0

 

 

FY15

200

100

 

FY16

225

226

 

FY17

225

155

 

FY18

225

 

 

LOP

300

588

 

THIS SHEET LAST UPDATED ON:  April , 2018

 

 

USAID Performance Indicator Reference Sheet - 13

Goal : Increased competitiveness of agricultural value chains

SO:  Inclusive Agriculture sector growth

Intermediate Result 1.3: Strengthened Local Capacity for Advocacy and Activity Implementation

Sub- Result- IR.1:

Name of Indicator:  Number of organizations/ enterprises identified as high potential for future awards

Is this a Performance Plan and Report indicator?  No ___    Yes __x__, for Reporting Year(s), FY 2014, FY 2015, FY2016, FY2017 and   FY2018                       

DESCRIPTION

Precise Definition(s):

Number of local organizations or enterprises who received capacity building from ADVANCE II and who meet criteria to receive funding from the USG

Unit of Measure: Numbers

Disaggregated by:  Type of organization and by value chain

Rational or justification for indicator (optional):

Type: Output

Direction of change:  Higher=better

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION

Data Source(s): ADVANCE field offices, MIS database

Method of data collection and construction : Capacity building records and reports

Frequency/Timing of Data Collection: Quarterly

Estimated coast of data collection:

Reporting Frequency: Annually

Individual(s) responsible at USAID:  AOTR and USAID/Ghana M&E Specialist

Individual responsible for providing data to USAID: ACDI/VOCA Chief of Party

Location of Data Storage:  ACDI/VOCA ADVANCE MIS Database

DATA QUALITY ISSUES

Date of Initial Data Quality Assessments and name of reviewer: TBD and M&E Coordinator

Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): TBD

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: TBD

Date of Future Data Quality Assessments (optional): TBD

CHANGES TO INDICATOR

Changes to Indicator

Procedures for Future Data Quality Assessments:  To verify the quality and consistency of the data collected and disseminated, the ADVANCE M&E team will conduct annual data quality reviews. Through this review, we will assess the validity, reliability and timeliness of data. Based on the review, we will modify data collection methodology as needed and update the M&E Plan accordingly. The M&E Coordinator will develop a Data Quality Strategy specific to the ADVANCE project and the data collection methods, sources and timelines that will be established.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: ADVANCE M&E Coordinator and ACDI/VOCA headquarters M&E

Presentation of data:  Table  and annual report narrative

Review of Data:  ACDI/VOCA M&E Coordinator

Reporting of Data: Annual Report and Performance Monitoring Report (PMR)

Notes on Baselines/Targets: 

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR VALUES

 

Notes

Baseline Values FY14

 0

 

Year

Targets

Actuals

 

FY15

3

0

 

FY16

4

0

 

FY17

5

8

 

FY18

7

   

LOP

7

8

 

THIS SHEET LAST UPDATED ON: April , 2018

 

 

Performance Indicator Reference Sheet - 14

Goal : Increased competitiveness of agricultural value chains

SO:  Inclusive Agriculture sector growth

Intermediate Result 1.3: Strengthened Local Capacity for Advocacy and Activity Implementation

Sub- Result- IR.1:

Name of Indicator: Number of organizations/ enterprises receiving capacity building support against key milestones

Is this a Performance Plan and Report indicator?  No ___    Yes __x__, for Reporting Year(s), FY 2014, FY 2015, FY2016 ,FY2017 and   FY2018                         

DESCRIPTION

Precise Definition(s): Number of organizations who received capacity building support from ADVANCE II in at least one of the following key areas: Governance, Administration, Human Resources Management, Financial Management, Organizational Management, Program Management and Project Performance Management.

Unit of Measure: Numbers

Disaggregated by:  Type of organization

Rational or justification for indicator (optional):

Type: Output

Direction of change:  Higher=better

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION

Data Source(s): ADVANCE field offices, MIS database

Method of data collection and construction : Capacity building records in Database  and reports

Frequency/Timing of Data Collection: Quarterly

Estimated coast of data collection:

Reporting Frequency: Quarterly

Individual(s) responsible at USAID:  AOTR and USAID/Ghana M&E Specialist

Individual responsible for providing data to USAID: ACDI/VOCA Chief of Party

Location of Data Storage:  ACDI/VOCA ADVANCE MIS Database

DATA QUALITY ISSUES

Date of Initial Data Quality Assessments and name of reviewer: TBD

Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): TBD

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: TBD

Date of Future Data Quality Assessments (optional): TBD

CHANGES TO INDICATOR

Changes to Indicator

Procedures for Future Data Quality Assessments:  To verify the quality and consistency of the data collected and disseminated, the ADVANCE M&E team will conduct annual data quality reviews. Through this review, we will assess the validity, reliability and timeliness of data. Based on the review, we will modify data collection methodology as needed and update the M&E Plan accordingly. The M&E Coordinator will develop a Data Quality Strategy specific to the ADVANCE project and the data collection methods, sources and timelines that will be established.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING 

Data Analysis: ADVANCE M&E and ACDI/VOCA Headquarters M&E

Presentation of data:  Table and report narrative

Review of Data:  ACDI/VOCA M&E Coordinator

Reporting of Data:  Quarterly/Semi-annual/Annual Performance Monitoring Report (PMR)

Notes on Baselines/Targets: 

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR VALUES

 

Notes

Baseline Values FY14

 0

 

Year

Targets

Actuals

 

FY15

9

0

 

FY16

20

5

 

FY17

40

10

 

FY18

50

 

 

LOP

50

15

 

THIS SHEET LAST UPDATED ON:  April , 2018

                                              

 

Performance Indicator Reference Sheet - 15

Goal : Increased competitiveness of agricultural value chains

SO:  Inclusive Agriculture sector growth

Intermediate Result 1.3: Strengthened Local Capacity for Advocacy and Activity Implementation

Sub- Result- IR.1:

Name of Indicator:  Number of awards made directly to local organizations by USAID

Is this a Performance Plan and Report indicator?  No ___    Yes __x__, for Reporting Year(s), FY 2014, FY 2015, FY2016 and FY2017 and   FY2018                            If yes link to foreign assistance frame work:                                                                                 

DESCRIPTION

Precise Definition(s): This indicator counts the number of awards made directly by the USG (not through intermediaries) to local organizations each fiscal year. It excludes awards made to public sector institutions but can include awards made to parastatals or universities. Awards can be either acquisition or assistance. For purposes of indicator reporting, at the time of the award a “local organization” must:1) Be organized under the laws of the recipient country, 2) Have its principal place of business in the recipient country, 3) Be majority owned by individuals who are citizens or lawful permanent residents of the recipient country or be managed by a governing body, the majority of whom are citizens or lawful permanent residents of a recipient country, 4) Not be controlled by a foreign entity or by an individual or individuals who are not citizens or permanent residents of the recipient country

Unit of Measure: Numbers

Disaggregated by:  Type of organization

Rational or justification for indicator (optional):

Type: Output

Direction of change:  Higher=better

PLAN FOR DATA COLLECTION

Data Source(s): USAID records

Method of data collection and construction : KII

Frequency/Timing of Data Collection: Annually

Estimated coast of data collection:

Reporting Frequency: Annually

Individual(s) responsible at USAID:  AOTR and USAID/Ghana M&E Specialist

Individual responsible for providing data to USAID: ACDI/VOCA Chief of Party

Location of Data Storage:  ACDI/VOCA ADVANCE MIS

DATA QUALITY ISSUES

Date of Initial Data Quality Assessments and name of reviewer: TBD

Known Data Limitations and Significance (if any): TBD

Actions Taken or Planned to Address Data Limitations: TBD

Date of Future Data Quality Assessments (optional): annually

CHANGES TO INDICATOR

Changes to Indicator

Procedures for Future Data Quality Assessments:  To verify the quality and consistency of the data collected and disseminated, the ADVANCE M&E team will conduct annual data quality reviews. Through this review, we will assess the validity, reliability and timeliness of data. Based on the review, we will modify data collection methodology as needed and update the M&E Plan accordingly. The M&E Coordinator will develop a Data Quality Strategy specific to the ADVANCE project and the data collection methods, sources and timelines that will be established.

PLAN FOR DATA ANALYSIS, REVIEW, & REPORTING

Data Analysis: ADVANCE M&E and ACDI/VOCA Headquarters M&E

Presentation of data:  Table  and annual report narrative

Review of Data:  TBD

Reporting of Data:  Quarterly/Semi-annual/Annual Performance Monitoring Report (PMR)

Notes on Baselines/Targets: 

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR VALUES

 

Notes

Baseline Values FY14

 0

 

Year

Targets

Actuals

 

FY15

2

0

 

FY16

3

0

 

FY17

4

1

 

FY18

5

 

 

LOP

5

1

 

THIS SHEET LAST UPDATED ON:  April , 2018